javascript hit counter

HEADPHONE WEEK: Sennheiser MM 60s

Comments (0)

headphones-week-eds.jpgSennheiser's new MM 60s may look suspiciously like it's PX 100s, but they're not, well they are, but they've been re-tweaked, honed, prodded and poked until they sound amazing - with the iPhone 3G that is. Because these on-ear marvels have been specifically designed for optimum performance with the iPhone.MM_60_zoom_iphone.jpg

Short Version

Name - MM 60s

Type - on-ear semi-closed headphones

How much - £75.99

How much should they cost - No more than £50

Should you buy them - They're good - better if you have an iPhone

The Long Version

Sound Quality

The MM 60s, much like they're identical cousin, the PX 100s, bring the bass. They're the bassiest on-ears I've ever had the pleasure to put on my head. That being said, you can lose some of the higher notes and all that bass can on-occasion muddy the vocal. But generally this isn't an issue and the MM 60s sound pretty sweet, and oddly do sound a teency weency bit better on my iPhone 3G than my iPod classic.

Build Quality

Sennheiser have in the past been accused of making some pretty shoddy mid-price products, especially some of their in-ear range. The MM 60s certainly aren't flimsy, but they're by no means as sturdy as other similarly priced headphones. They're a bit like watching Peter Crouch play football, you know his legs aren't just going to break, but you can't help thinking its a miracle they don't.

The headband is easy to adjust and feels pretty comfortable as do the phones. Sennheiser have also included an iPhone compatible mic which is a bit low down on the line so unless your head is the size of a small asteroid you're going to have to hold it up to your mouth, which pretty much makes it pointless. Because you're holding your hands free mic with your hands, so...never mind.

The MM 60s phones do fold though, rather brilliantly, into an ultra portable package.sennheiser-mm60.jpg

Packaging

The MM 60s come in a box which leaves you in no doubt who they're aimed at: "Giving the iPhone the sound it deserves."

The MM 60s also come with a nifty little case which the folded Sennheisers slip nicely into.

Conclusion

The MM 60s do sound great in quiet environments, in the office or in bed or on the loo, they're as good as a really high-end set of cans. But out and about even a moderate background noise can ruin the experience.

And they're pretty expensive for what are essentially an only vaguely tweaked pair of £35 headphones. Personally I find the sound quality of Tuesday's V-Jays superior and they're £15 cheaper.

If you really like Sennheiser products these might suit you, but if you prefer substance then go for the V-Jays.

As part of Tech Digest's Headphones Week, here are ten pairs of headphones / earphones that you can actually afford.

By "afford" I'm talking those that retail for under £200. Don't worry, there are some decent pairs for well under that, and you can probably pick them all up at a discount online.

Plenty of different styles represented here, so whatever type you like -- in ear, noise cancelling, cans -- you're Shure (ahem... sure) to find something here.

Click on the image below to start the tour.

headphones-week-eds.jpg

Plantronics.JPG
Hello you. Welcome to Day 3 of the Tech Digest Headphones Week where we're reviewing a whole bunch of different head speakers to give us all a bit of an idea what it's worth slapping our dollar down for. Remember, came-with-your-MP3-player headphones are the disease. Headphones week is the cure.

Today's a little different. Today I'm taking a look at a set of on-ear head-grabbers that you can't plug into your music machine - unless it happens to do audio-out via USB. Ladies, gentlemen, this is the Skype-certified Plantronics Audio 655 headset and it comes with a microphone too.


The Short Version

Name - Plantronics Audio 655

Type - On-ear closed cup PC headset

How much - £39.99

How much should they cost - £59.00

Should you buy them - If you use VoIP, play PC games and don't mind being tethered to the computer - yes, definitely

The Long Version

Sound Quality

Let's not beat around the bush here. The Audio 655s sound superb. They really do. They're a fantastic example of all round balance. Just the one set of 40mm drivers but they deliver good clear treble, confident mid-range and highly competent, if not heart-pounding, bass.

In fact, that's probably my only criticism. There's nothing wildly special about the sound here. The Audio 655s aren't going to make you rediscover your music collection but then who cares, you're probably not going to be using these listen to music. They're designed to transmit the human voice as close to the real thing as possible and that's exactly what they do.

Build Quality

There's no two ways about it. The Audio 655s are plastic. They're backed up with cushioning in the right places - top of the bonse and round the ears - but they're completely plastic. Admittedly, it's good, thick plastic but there's something a little clacky about the build. It's a touch on the loose side.

Plantronics-build.JPG

That said, it's nice and flexible. You're not going to break them unless you get all the weight of one of your computer chair legs right on top of one of the cups or you hand it to a proper tough little toddler in the mould of a future Geoff Capes. My advice would be to do neither and I'm sure they'll last you.

The cabling's thick enough and they'll adjust to all head sizes, including the most extreme, but it's probably the microphone arm that's the best put together. It's really solid with hardly any lateral movement, it's telescopic so you can adjust it to the position of your mouth and it stows neatly out of the way when you're not using it. What's more, it's largely made of rubber so you're not going to be snapping it off by accident. There's handsome devil below modelling them.

Plantronics-audio655.JPG


Phones

The Plantronics website claims the ear pads offer "pillow-soft" comfort. That's probably taking it a bit far. I don't think I'd have much luck using them to sleep on but I'd say they're close to the quality of your least favourite sofa cushion. The point is that they're thick enough not to hurt your lug holes and they've got a snazzy red lining too. No skull strain issues here at all. Guarantee.

Plantronics-mic.JPG

Usability

Largely positive in this department. The USB connection means that there's no faffing around with two 3.5mm plugs and that you've probably got a lot more port choice depending on what suits you best. Mercifully, there's no irritating software involved and my only gripe is that, from time to time, I had to unplug them and plug them in again to get them going - usually when I'd been sticking things in the dedicated audio socket at the same time.

The other neat little trick these Plantronics have up their sleeves is that you can fine tune the volume at the left ear - the same ear as the mic arm. There's perhaps not enough adjustment at your fingertips as you might like but it'll certainly make the difference between a good, clear level and losing your hearing.

Lastly, the mic itself works a charm with fully operational noise cancelling tech. Functions as it should. What more can you say.

Conclusion

Buy them. Quite simple. If you're looking to spend more than a tenner and less than £50 on a PC headset, then look no further. I can bitch and whinge about this and that, as is my want, but, when it comes down to it, these little darlings offer value beyond belief, reason and probably manufacturing sense too.

More from Headphones week over here with Day 1 over here and Day 2 just beyond.

HEADPHONES WEEK: Jays' V-Jays

Comments (0)

headphones-week-eds.jpg

P6020035.JPGOn-ear headphones are making a comeback. Okay maybe I just made that up. But the 80s are big again aren't they? And no one had in-ear headphones in the 80s, they had on-ears, and they were right. On-ears are comfier and safer than in-ears, less obtrusive than cans and they can sound freaking awesome. As proved by Jay's V-Jays.

The Short Version

Name - V-Jays

Type - On-ear open headphones

How much - £59.99

How much should they cost - £60.00

Should you buy them - If you're self-conscious, I'd avoid them, if not, they're well worth the money.

The Long Version

Sound Quality

On-ear headphones don't look cool - but isn't cool all about perceptions; prevailing social norms? Isn't cool transient? For the sake of these super-wicked headphones, I hope so. I'll admit the first time I stepped out in the V-Jays I felt like a prize numpty. I might as well have had Mr Motivator on my head, that's how '93 I looked.

But as soon as I hit play, I forgot about my headgear, so ensconced was I in the precise and amazing sound they yielded: deep and rangy bass with taut, precise treble and a hefty enough mid to handle anything I threw at it.

Never has listening to Godspeed! stomping down Commercial Road felt quite so epic, though they weren't amazing at drowning out the loftier decibels on the rickety District Line.P6020028.JPG

Build Quality

The V-Jays are light on design features, which suits me - they look serious, understated and stylish. The square phones are about as flash as it gets. The extendable headband can sometimes be a tad fiddly, adjusting each side to get a vaguely symmetrical shape, but it fits very comfortably.

The cable is about a girthy as you'd expect on a pair of high-end headphones with an interesting 15mm headphone jack-split in the middle, though what purpose it is supposed to serve has, as yet, alluded me.P6020032.JPG

They feel eminently sturdy, like a Sherpa. You trust them.

The phones fold under the headband to add a modicum of portability but it is one glaring concession of the on-ear genus of headphone: they aren't easily stuffed in a pocket.

Phones

Swathed in familiar black sponge, it seems things haven't moved on since about 1979 in-terms of ear-phone casing technology.

But the fact is they were comfy in 1979, and they're still comfy now, and you get a pair of spares, once the others are too encrusted with your aural discharge for you to hear through.

Packaging

V-Jays come in a rather snazzy box wedged into some good thick foam, but they're light on accessories. If Jays really wanted to give V-Jays the professional veneer a hard-case might have done the trick.

Conclusion

These headphones are so good I don't mind looking a bit lame (okay pretty lame) in order to enjoy their full and glorious goodness. The first time I donned the V-Jays, it was 5.45pm, I was on a packed Northern Line train, and a large and unremmitingly odious man behind me was breathing in my ear, I put them on as much as to block his heinous violation of my ear-canal as to listen to some tunes. But hearing them was like a epiphany: "Oh remember this," I thought, "Music! As it should be. Loud and bassy and ace."

If you care more about your hair than your music then maybe V-Jays aren't for you. But they're certainly for me.

Shure-SE115.JPGWelcome to Headphones Week on Tech Digest. I've been getting a little wound up with rubbish sound quality of late. It's bad enough listening to squashed up music files but doing it through came-with-the-player headphones is even worse. If you're not up on this already, then I'll give you a very quick version of why you need to spend money on them.

Free headphones neither isolate nor cancel ambient sound and most likely don't fit very well in your ears. So, that means you have to turn the volume up loud in order to get the immersive experience you're after which then distorts the quality of the music. Add to that the fact that the drivers inside basic headphones are rubbish anyway and you've got the equivalent of AM audio in you brain. Understood?

So, the next question is what to buy? How much do you need to spend to get decent sound and at what point is it the Emperor's new airwaves? So, I've picked five sets of headphones fairly new to the market and I'm giving them a little low-down each afternoon this week. I believe they call it a review. If it's useful, let me know and I'll do some more.

The Short Version

Name - Shure SE115 in-ear headphones

Type - over the ear sound isolators

How much - £66 plus postage

How much should they cost - £45

Should you buy them - no

The Long Version

Build

I'll start with the positive's here because there aren't many and I'll feel like I've achieved something once I've got them out of the way. First, the build quality is really good - probably the best out of all the headphones I'm looking at this week.

thick-cable.JPG

middle-bit.JPG

They've got proper thick cables, the kind you could garrotte people with without them breaking. They mean that what you're buying is as close to "for life" as you can get with these things. The leads also come in two parts with a nice, chunky 3.5mm connection in the middle. I'm not sure what it is I'm supposed to insert in between my ears and my mp3 player but I feel very safe that these Shures would do whatever that job is very well.

Buds

buds.JPG

The buds themselves aren't too bad. You get the choice of six different sets - three of some disappointing grey rubber nothingness but the others made of squishable memory foam type material that you roll between your thumb and forefinger and jam into your head before they have time to expand.

The look a bit nasty once you've bullied them into submission - rather like greasy Mediterranean olives; doubly so when they come out of your ears pitted with wax.

The effect is that they pretty much fit to fill your aural canal and block out quite a lot of the ambient noise - not all, but good enough to give the drivers a chance to work their magic.

Shure-olive.JPG

Packaging

Yeah, this is probably the last good thing I can say about the SE115s. The packaging is ok. For a £66 set of 'phones, you do get set up alright. What I'm referring to is the small black canvas zip bag complete with metal carabiner because, obviously, we're all about quality audio while we're trying to tackle the next overhang.

Shure-bag.JPG

The Shure SE115s may actually be targeted at extreme sports enthusiasts but the point is that the bag is ok. It may even be slightly waterproof. Probably isn't but the promise is good.

Sound Quality

Here's where these headphones really fall down. They sound rubbish - admittedly, better than a free pair but, if they'd been any more expensive, I'd be absolutely panning them. It may be the choice of material for the ear bud foam but all punch of the sound is lost. It's like listening to £10,000 stereo system with hiking socks shoved in your ears.

You can tell that someone somewhere has done their job but that another bod down the line has totally ruined their work. It's soft, muffled, rich but completely unexciting, and there can be no more damning word for audio equipment than that. They're just plain lifeless.

Shure-packaging.JPG

Conclusion

The Shure SE115s offer a reachable step up in audio from freebee phones but, if I were you, I'd reach a little higher, or, at least, in a different direction.

Klipsch S4 earphones-1_2.jpgAudio nabob, Klipsch, has made their first foray into the mid-price earphone market, releasing the Image S4 in-ear headphones.

"But what's really cool," claims Klipsch, is that "the S4 uses the same proprietary ear tips as its pricier predecessors," thus giving the S4 the same capacity for noise isolation as its snazzier siblings.

"People have less disposable income these days. Therefore, we felt it was necessary to develop reasonably priced, high-performance earphones that go above and beyond what you'd expect from the stock earbuds that come with your MP3 player," said Klipsch dude, Mark Casavant.

Unlike circular-shaped designs that abound on most other in-ear phones, Klipsch's oval ear tips naturally fit the contours of your ear canals, apparently providing comfortable long-term wear. This virtually bespoke fit creates much cleaner, more refined bass and better noise isolation - not bad for £69.99.

"Once you have the right fit and seal, these earphones are virtually impossible to feel - letting you listen longer and better," said Mark Blanchard, inventor of the company's oval ear tips.

The Image S4 will be available in a piano black finish with three different-sized oval ear tips, an ear-tip cleaning tool and a compact, crush-resistant aluminium case.

sen260509.jpgSennheiser has released three new in-ear headphones, the CX 550 STYLE II, OMX 95 VC Style II and MX 95 VC Style II.

Aimed squarely at well-groomed, jogging, Audi drivers, the Style II series all feature premium quality crafted metal designs and are "optimized for iPod" (Just how? That's what I want to know).

They all wield "extra-powerful neodymium-iron magnets" which are sure to sound loads better than the buds bundled with your mp3 player do.

They also come with a snazzy case to put them in for that 1% of time they aren't wrapped around your iPod - we all know we're not meant to but we do it anyway, because its easier right, so deal with it.

The CX 550s feature ambient noise dampening and are designed to stop sound leakage annoying other passengers, but retailing at £80 you might want to try the cheaper alternative the OMXs at £60 or the MXs for £40.

Aliph introduce third gen Jawbone - Prime

Comments (0)

model_earcandy_purple_large.jpgBluetooth doyen Aliph has launched the third generation of their Jawbone bluetooth headset.

The sleek and discreet Jawbone Prime features refined "NoiseAssassin" technology and comes in a variety of natty 'earcandy' colours as well as more sedate business shades.

Its "NoiseAssassin" technology, developed initially with the military, and then refined by Aliph's own in-house team of bods, works by comparing an audio signal to the vibration coming from the Voice Activity Sensor which rest on the user's cheek. Banishing everything else and apparently giving the user five times better call clarity with nine decibels more sound suppression than Jawbone 2.

The new headset can pair with up to eight devices and its multipoint feature allows it to connect to two devices simultaneously. And if the Prime works with Skype, as the previous headsets did, fielding calls from your phone or VoIP service of choice will be no bother.

jays_vjays_black_pers_high.jpgSwedish audiophile JAYS have been knocking out affordable high-performance headphones for a while now. Their amazing j-JAYS In-Ear Noise Cancelling headphones were a constant companion of mine for well over a year, until that fateful day. No, don't. I don't want to talk about it. I've moved on.

So I was excited to see that JAYS are to release an open, on-ear headphone next month. JAYS promise that the new v-JAYS, will "deliver finer bass without overwhelming the finer audio nuances that some other headphones often miss". Which is nice.

JAYS new foldable 59g badboys will be available from the start of June for £59.99 - look out for a full review in the coming days.

sony-bt100-cx.jpgSony's made itself a bit of a name around here for steadfastly producing headphone models that don't really excite but still sell well. Today it's announced some mostly unexciting Bluetooth headphones.

Both models use Bluetooth 2.1 to communicate with your phone or MP3 player. The DR-BT100CX are in-ear and have a little dongle to control volume and skip tracks as well as answering or rejecting phone calls. They feature eight hours of playback time and are recharged via USB.

The BT101s have a headband design and pack 30mm neodymium drivers. There's twelve hours of playback in the onboard battery and again it recharges via USB. Both models support A2DP, AVRCP, HFP and HSP Bluetooth profiles and are available to order right now from Sony Style.

Press Release

etymotics-headphones.jpgUber-high-end headphone manufacturer Etymotic is releasing a set of its personalised earphones for the iPhone and iPod. The hf2 Custom Fit headset integrates a microphone and 'answer call' button into the cord, so that you can use your iPhone without getting it out of your pocket.

A partnership with ACS (Advanced Communications Solutions) means that the headphones are custom-moulded to your ear. They stick a load of goo in your ear, which sets, and then produce a set of headphones the exact same shape as your inner ear.

That custom moulding ensures that a perfect fit is achieved, so the headphones are completely isolating. As a result, you can listen to music much more quietly and still get fantastic detail in the sound without damaging your hearing. They also stay put in your ear - they won't fall out if you're exercising.

I've tried the earphones myself, and they're incredible - I've spent the last couple of days obsessively listening to all the songs I love, because everything sounds so much better. It's amazing how much detail there is in songs that you're often unaware of, even if you're using a respectable pair of headphones already.

The custom-moulded headphones don't come cheap. The kit is £90, plus another £90 for the fitting session. But if you're an audiophile then that's cheap for what you're getting - almost perfect sound reproduction. Though, of course, you'll need to re-encode everything into Apple's lossless format to get the most out of it.

The hf2's will be available from April 28th.

Etymotic

Ultimate-ears-700.jpgLogitech has released a set of in-ear headphones this morning to sit right near the very top of their Ultimate Ears range. The UE 700s are noise isolators with dual armature drivers with one for bass and midrange and the other for high end and midrange.

They come in a hard case but weigh just 11.6g and will block out up to 26 dB of ambient sound with their snug-fitting, soft-silicone or foam compy ear cushions. You get three different sizes when you buy the £149.99 device just to make sure there's no gaps between your lug holes and the rest of the world.

The idea is that you can listen to music at a relatively low level and so don't end up distorting the sound of your music from pushing it too hard through whatever in-built amp you're using.

Not cheap but, if the rest of the Ultimate Ears range is anything to go by, worth the money. Seventy-five per cent of the music industry can't be wrong.

Noise cancelling headphones test:

Ultimate Ears

Shure-eds.jpg
Headphone manufacturer Shure has just dropped us word of a couple of new products that they're bringing to market.

The SE115s are the latest addition to Shure's noise-isolating range. They come in blue, pink, black and red, and - well - there's not a whole lot more detail than that being offered, except that they have 'enhanced bass'. They cost £100, which seems a tad steep, I must admit. As they're from Shure, though. you can bet they'll sound good.

PG27-and-PG42.jpgAlso announced are a pair of USB condenser microphones - the PG27USB and PG42USB. They come with plug and play connectivity, along with zero-latency headphone monitoring, and monitor mix control.

These are most likely targeted at pro audio professionals and podcasters that spend a lot of time travelling - they've got a rugged, portable design. The PG27 and PG42 will cost £220 and £270 respectively, and be available from 20th June.

Shure

sennheiser-mx-85.jpgSennheiser, a company with a long heritage in headphone design, has just unveiled five new pairs of headphones that come in a variety of shapes, sizes, and prices. Only one pair - the high-end CX 380 Sport II's - are noise-isolating, presumably because you often need to hear the outside world, too, when you're indulging in exercise.

Starting with the low-end, let's begin at the MX 80s. These are fairly standard earbuds, with a little bit of extra bass and a waterproof and 'sweatproof' (eww) design. They're also pretty tough, and should be able to take a bit of knocking about. £25.

Then there's the MX 85s which are very similar to the MX 80s but have a 'twist-to-fit' system that should keep the buds in your ear a little more effectively if you're waving your head about wildly, as one is wont to do while 'sporting'. They cost £35. A tenner for a fit mechanism?

Moving up the range further, there's the OMX 80s, which are again pretty much the same phones, but with earhooks on them, providing a slightly different way of keeping them on your head. They come with a 'reflective rear stripe' too, so you don't get run over in the dark. Also £35.

Refusing to quit with the different ways of keeping headphones attached to your head, Sennheiser's also got the PMX 80s, which have an ergonomic neckband to hold things in place, and ensure that just as that power chorus comes in, you won't get your buds rudely yanked out. They also have the aforementioned reflective strip, and cost £35.

Then lastly, at the top of the range, are the CX 380s. These are more like it - silicon sleeves provide a tight fit for the in-ear design, they're washable, and have a rather more high-performance driver than the cheaper models. They cost more, though - £50.

My thoughts are that the extra price on these compared to standard models might not really be worth the outlay. It's only a bit of plastic, after all. That said, I don't do an awful lot of sport, so if you do, then put me right on Twitter at @techdigest.

Sennheiser

elecom-power-graphixx-earphones.jpg

In the whole world of tech, earphones seem to attract the most functional, boring designs available. I appreciate there's not a great deal of scope for creativity, given they still need to fit in the ear (thus making some kind of alien-starfish design distinctly uncomfortable), but I always thought they could be a little bit more interesting than just lumps of circular black (or white, Apple fans) plastic. Turns out I was right, and the result is this lovely series of colourful earphones from Elecom.

In terms of specifications, they're actually pretty standard. To those that understand earphone specs, that translates to a 9mm driver unit, 92dB/1mW 16 Ω - that sort of thing. They promise to block out "most of the unwanted noises" and should fit snugly into the ear canal. Though, when they're looking that cool and brightly coloured, they could cause deep irreparable lacerations to my earlobe, and I'd still be tempted to wear them on the tube.

throat-mic.jpg"Mmm, they're coming right at us," are the words that spring to mind when I look at the commercially available Sanwa throat microphone but, no, this isn't a tool limited to those with voice box issues.

Throat mics neutralise the problems of having to be heard in a noisy environment as they take their audio cues from the vibrations of your neck rather than amplifying the sound that comes out of your mouth where it would have to compete with car horns, drills, police sirens and such to be heard on the other end.

They're already used in the military because killing people just isn't killing people unless you're doing it with the best kit but this is one of the first times we've seen the tech offered to consumers. No word on cost just yet but I wouldn't worry about it for 12 months or so. Sanwa are only doing throat mic business in Japan just now. Right, that's it. I'm moving.

Sanwa (via Akihabara News)

solio-communicator.jpgTucked away amongst the smaller stands at MWC 2009, slightly crowded out by the Samsungs and Nokias of this world, is a little company called "Better Energy Systems". They have a subsidiary called Solio, who make solar-powered kit for mobile phones.

You might have heard of them - a quick browse of Solio's site suggests that Saol - a Masai Junior Elder from IIkinye Village in Kenya - is a power user, as is Ian Davis, from the Polar Challenge expedition. Best of all is the picture of President Barack Obama looking decidedly overwhlemed when being presented with his Solio Classic.

But this post is about the Solio Communicator, which by all accounts is a rather novel product. It's a hands-free kit, but charges with solar power, so you just stick it to your car window and never think about the battery ever again.

If you live in some Arctic climes where you don't get sun very much for half the year, then it's also chargable off the cigarette lighter port, a USB port or a wall adaptor. It's compatible with all Bluetooth-enabled phones, and will retail for €80 (£70ish). Available mid 2009.

i2i-ed.jpg
I was quite enamoured by the idea of the i2i Stream when I had a quick look at it at CES but then what's a concept until you've actually tried the bugger? So, it fell to the wonderful Susi from Shiny Shiny to take them for a spin and work out whether wireless music streaming is actually something that we need.

Ultrasone HFI headphones

German company Ultrasone has announced its new six-strong range of HFI headphones. Not only do they look pretty luxurious but they incorporate S-Logic which pushes sound around the ear by positioning the drivers off-centre. This gives the impression that you're listening to speakers several metres away.

The headphones produce around a quarter of the low-frequency magnetic field compared to some traditional ones, as well as MU Metal that shields and reduces magnetic radiation by up to 98%.

Sony-XB300.jpgLet's talk about bass. You don't hear proper bass - you feel it. In your stomach, your gut. That feeling is generated by massive subwoofers bigger than your head vibrating the air. That's why I'm more than a little skeptical of Sony's new XB series of headphones.

They claim to recreate "club ambiance", which presumably includes meat-headed bouncers, two-hour queues for the cloakroom and many, many, identical men in white shirts. There's five models in the range - three closed-cup, over-the-head designs (the MDR-XB700/500/300s) and two in-ear models (MDR-XB40EX/20EX).

The over-the-heads have 50mm drivers, and the in-ears have "an innovative 'direct vibe' acoustic design", apparently. They'll all be available in March, but there's no pricing info available yet. For all kinds of scientific diagrams, click to Sony's Extra Bass page on their website.

Sony Extra Bass

More on Sony: Super-thin Sony Bravia ZX1 ready for sale - Bravia EX1 & 200Hz Z4500 on shelf too | Sony XEL-1 OLED TV available in UK but cheaper to fly to America to get it

©2009 Shiny Digital
Related Posts with Thumbnails